New Paper: Catastrophes of the 21st Century


I have a new paper in press, titled “Catastrophes of the 21st Century.” The paper was originally prepared for the 2015 Aon Benfield Australia Hazards Conference. Here is the abstract:

There are few ways to better display our ignorance than by speculating on the long-term future. At the same time, making wise decisions depends upon both anticipating an uncertain future and the limits of what we can know. This paper takes a broad look at global trends in place today, where they may be taking us, and the implications for thinking about catastrophes of the 21st century. I suggest three types of catastrophes lie ahead. The familiar – hazards that we have come to expect based on experience and knowledge, such as earthquakes and typhoons. The emergent – hazards that are the product of a complex, interconnected world, such as financial meltdowns, supply chain disruption and epidemics. The extraordinary — hazards that may or may not be foreseen or foreseeable, but for which we are wholly unprepared, such as an asteroid impact, massive solar storm, or even fantastic scenarios found only in fiction, such as the consequences of contact with alien life. I will argue that our collective attention and expertise is, perhaps understandably, disproportionately focused on the familiar. The consequence, however, is a sort of intellectual myopia. We know more than we think about the familiar and less than we should about the emergent and the extraordinary. Yet our ability to deal with the hazards of the future likely depends much more on our ability to prepare for the emergent and the extraordinary.

The full pre-publication version of the paper is available here as a PDF. Comments welcomed.

5 thoughts on “New Paper: Catastrophes of the 21st Century

  1. Pingback: Week in review – science edition | Climate Etc.

  2. Pingback: Week in review – science edition – Enjeux énergies et environnement

  3. A couple trivia comments (typos, I don’t think I’m qualified to write about the main topic): in table 1, row 1, column 4, I suspect “build” should be “built”. And row 6, same table and same column, “is” –> “it” (and maybe “promises” –> “promised”?). Page 9, the text over figures 8a and 8b refers to “left” and “right” figures, but in fact they’re stacked.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Pingback: Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup #228 | Watts Up With That?

  5. Pingback: Promessa mantenuta… quasi : Attività Solare ( Solar Activity )

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s